何以二程、朱熹高度重视“入德之门”在德性修养中的重要性？

Why the Cheng Brothers and Zhu Xi Attached Paramount Importance to the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood” in the Sequential Process of Moral Self-Cultivation?

二程、朱熹高度强调 “入德之门” 的深层原因：

理论建构与实践维度的双重探索

The Deep Reasons Why the Cheng Brothers and Zhu Xi Strongly Emphasized the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ”: A Dual Exploration of Theoretical Construction and Practical Dimensions

一、理论层面：构建道德形上学，巩固儒家本位

I. The Theoretical Dimension: Constructing a Moral Metaphysics and Consolidating the Confucian Standpoint

程朱对 “入德之门” 的推崇，并非始于教育方法的空谈，而是根植于其理论体系的内在需求 —— 他们要为儒家道德伦理找到终极的形上依据，打通 “天理” 与 “人性” 之间的隔阂，并以此为武器彻底批判佛道 “异端” 之学，重新确立儒学在中国思想界的主导地位。

The Cheng-Zhu school’s esteem for the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” did not begin with empty talk about educational methods; it was rooted in the intrinsic demands of their theoretical system. They sought to find an ultimate metaphysical foundation for Confucian morality and ethics, to break through the barrier between “Heavenly Principle” and “human nature,” and to use this as a weapon to thoroughly criticize the “heterodox” teachings of Buddhism and Daoism, thereby re-establishing the dominant position of Confucianism in Chinese intellectual life.

1.1 填补理论空白，搭建理学架构

1.1 Filling the Theoretical Void and Erecting the Framework of Neo-Confucianism

在程朱之前，儒学多侧重具体的人伦与政治实践，对 “人性的终极依据是什么”“道德修养何以可能” 这类形而上的深层问题，缺乏系统回应，这也正是佛老之学能在精神领域占据优势的关键原因。二程以 “天理” 二字建立理学基础，将 “天理” 推为宇宙万物的终极本体、社会伦理的普遍法则；朱熹进一步将这一天理本体论延伸至心性论层面，提出 “性即理” 的核心命题，完成了儒家道德形上学的完整建构。

Before the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi, Confucianism mostly focused on concrete human relations and political practice, lacking a systematic response to such profound metaphysical questions as “What is the ultimate foundation of human nature?” and “How is moral cultivation possible?” – precisely the key reason why Buddhism and Daoism could gain ascendancy in the spiritual realm. The Cheng brothers established the foundation of Neo-Confucianism with the term “Heavenly Principle,” elevating it to the ultimate substance of all things in the universe and the universal law of social ethics; Zhu Xi further extended this ontology of Heavenly Principle to the theory of mind-and-nature, proposing the core proposition that “nature is principle,” thus completing the full construction of a Confucian moral metaphysics.

在程朱的理论架构中，“入德之门” 的关键价值，是作为 “天理” 与 “人性”、“本体” 与 “工夫” 之间的贯通性枢纽。这个枢纽的核心载体，正是《大学》。二程将《大学》从《礼记》中抽出，重新编排诠释，强调其是唯一留存的、由圣人制定的 “为学次第”—— 这个 “次第” 并非简单的读书顺序，而是基于 “天理” 与 “人事” 的内在逻辑，搭建起的修行阶梯；朱熹则进一步将《大学》置于《四书》之首，明确它是进入儒家道德世界的门户，学者必须由此入手，才能循序渐进，不偏离圣人之道。

Within the theoretical framework of the Cheng-Zhu school, the key value of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” is that it acts as the connecting hub between “Heavenly Principle” and “human nature,” and between “substance” and “effort.” The core vehicle of this hub is precisely The Great Learning. The Cheng brothers extracted The Great Learning from the Book of Rites, rearranged and reinterpreted it, and stressed that it was the sole surviving “sequence of learning” laid down by the sages – a sequence that was not merely a reading order but a cultivation ladder built upon the internal logic linking Heavenly Principle and human affairs. Zhu Xi went further, placing The Great Learning at the head of the Four Books and explicitly identifying it as the gateway for entering the Confucian moral world; a learner, he insisted, must begin here in order to progress step by step without deviating from the way of the sages.

更关键的是，这个 “入德之门” 的理论次第，与理学本体论的逻辑完全吻合。《大学》的核心纲领是 “三纲领八条目”：“明明德” 指向的是人性中本具的天理，“新民” 是将这种道德天理推行到社会人伦，“止于至善” 则是道德与天理浑然合一的终极境界；而 “格物、致知、诚意、正心、修身、齐家、治国、平天下” 的八条目，既是 “入德之门” 的实践路径，更是天理从本体界向下贯通到人事界的完整逻辑链条。

More crucially, the theoretical sequence of this “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” matches the logic of Neo-Confucian ontology perfectly. The core program of The Great Learning is the “three guiding principles and eight items”: “illustrating illustrious virtue” points to the Heavenly Principle inherently possessed by human nature; “renovating the people” is the extension of this moral Heavenly Principle into social human relations; and “resting in the highest good” is the ultimate state where morality and Heavenly Principle are completely fused into one. The eight items – “investigation of things, extension of knowledge, sincerity of the will, rectification of the mind, self-cultivation, regulation of the family, ordering of the state, and bringing peace to the whole world” – are not only the practical path of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ,” but also the complete logical chain through which Heavenly Principle runs from the ontological realm down into the realm of human affairs.

在这个贯通过程中，“格物” 是踏入道德实践的第一步，也是天理落地的起点。程颐解释 “格物” 为 “穷理”—— 即探究事物背后的天理；朱熹进一步补充，“格物” 的本质是 “即物穷理”，通过接触具体事物、探究事物的深层道理，逐步体认内在于人性中的终极天理。在程朱看来，人心本然具备天理，但由于被气禀所拘、被人欲所蔽，天理难以直接显现；而《大学》的 “入德之门”，正是一套循序渐进的 “去污” 流程：从格物穷理入手，逐步突破个人的气禀之偏，唤醒内心本有的天理；再经由致知、诚意、正心的内在修养，将天理转化为真实的德行；最终通过修身、齐家、治国、平天下的实践，将个体道德贯通到社会人伦，实现 “体用一源，显微无间” 的境界。

In this process of connection, “investigation of things” is the first step into moral practice and the starting point for Heavenly Principle’s actualization in the world. Cheng Yi interpreted “investigation of things” as “exhausting principle” – that is, exploring the Heavenly Principle behind things. Zhu Xi supplemented this by explaining that the essence of “investigation of things” is “to exhaust principle by approaching things”: through contact with concrete things and inquiry into their deeper principles, one gradually realizes the ultimate Heavenly Principle inherent in human nature. In the Cheng-Zhu view, the human mind originally possesses Heavenly Principle, but because it is constrained by one’s physical endowment and obscured by human desires, Heavenly Principle cannot manifest directly. The “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” in The Great Learning is precisely a step-by-step process of “removing the stains”: starting from investigating things and exhausting principle, one gradually breaks through the partiality of one’s physical endowment and awakens the Heavenly Principle originally within the mind; then, through the internal cultivation of extending knowledge, making the will sincere, and rectifying the mind, one transforms Heavenly Principle into genuine virtue; finally, through the practices of self-cultivation, regulating the family, ordering the state, and bringing peace to the whole world, one lets individual morality flow through social human relations, attaining the state where “substance and function share one source, and the subtle and the manifest have no gap between them.”

这一理论建构，精准填补了此前儒学的重大空白：此前的儒学多是零散的道德格言或政治论述，而程朱通过 “入德之门”，将天理的本体世界、人性的道德实践、社会的人伦秩序，整合成一个环环相扣、逻辑严密的完整体系 —— 这是儒学首次拥有了可与佛老之学比肩的形上理论架构。

This theoretical construction precisely filled a major lacuna in earlier Confucianism: previously, Confucianism had largely consisted of scattered moral maxims or political arguments, but by means of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ,” the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi integrated the ontological world of Heavenly Principle, the moral practice of human nature, and the human-relations order of society into a complete, interlocking, logically rigorous system – this was the first time Confucianism possessed a metaphysical theoretical structure that could stand comparison with Buddhism and Daoism.

1.2 批判佛道，确立内在超越的理路

1.2 Criticizing Buddhism and Daoism and Establishing an Approach of Inner Transcendence

在儒学发展的历史进程中，两汉以来的谶纬神学、魏晋玄学以及南北朝时期传入的佛教，都对儒学的正统地位构成了严重挑战。尤其是佛教的心性思想与道教的形而上学思辨，在理论深度上形成了明显优势；而儒学长期局限于具体的政治人伦实践，对 “性与天道” 这类形而上的核心问题缺乏系统回应，难以在精神层面与佛老抗衡。程朱清晰地认识到，若想重新确立儒学的主导地位，必须在 “内圣” 的形上层面突破佛老的理论桎梏 —— 而 “入德之门”，正是他们破局的关键抓手。

In the historical course of Confucianism’s development, the prophetic and numerological theology since the Han, the Xuanxue (Neo-Daoism) of the Wei and Jin, and the Buddhism introduced during the Southern and Northern Dynasties all posed serious challenges to the orthodox status of Confucianism. In particular, Buddhist thought on mind-and-nature and Daoist metaphysical speculation developed a clear advantage in theoretical depth. Confucianism, long confined to concrete political and human-relations practice, lacked a systematic response to core metaphysical questions such as “nature and the Way of Heaven” and found it difficult to compete with Buddhism and Daoism on the spiritual plane. The Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi clearly recognized that if they were to re-establish the dominant position of Confucianism, they had to break through the theoretical shackles of Buddhism and Daoism on the metaphysical level of “inner sageliness” – and the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” was the crucial lever for this breakthrough.

程朱对佛老之学的批判，并非简单的情绪性排斥，而是基于 “体用关系” 的理论对决。二程一针见血地指出佛教的核心问题：“圣人本天，释氏本心”—— 意思是，儒家以真实存在的 “天理”（即自然法则与人伦秩序的统一体）为超越性依据，而佛教将一切归于 “心” 的幻象，彻底割裂了本体与现象的关联，属于二元论的外在超越；朱熹则进一步批判佛老之学的 “空虚无实”：佛教追求 “空”、道教追求 “无”，本质上是脱离现实人伦、抛弃道德实践的 “虚学”，而儒家的 “天理” 绝非悬空之物，它贯通于现实的人伦日用之中，必须通过具体的道德实践才能体认。

The Cheng-Zhu critique of Buddhism and Daoism was not simple emotional rejection, but a theoretical showdown grounded in the “relationship between substance and function.” The Cheng brothers incisively identified the core problem of Buddhism: “The sage takes Heaven as his basis; the Buddhists take the mind as their basis.” This meant that Confucianism takes the actually existing “Heavenly Principle” (the unity of natural law and the order of human relations) as its transcendent foundation, whereas Buddhism attributes everything to the illusion of “mind,” completely severing the connection between substance and phenomena – a dualistic outer transcendence. Zhu Xi further criticized the “emptiness and unreality” of Buddhism and Daoism: Buddhism’s pursuit of “emptiness” and Daoism’s pursuit of “non-being” are, in essence, “vacuuous learning” divorced from real human relations and abandoned moral practice. By contrast, Confucian “Heavenly Principle” is in no way something suspended in the void; it runs through real, daily human relations and can only be recognized through concrete moral practice.

在程朱看来，《大学》的 “入德之门”，正是儒家对抗佛老 “外在超越” 的独门武器 —— 它标识出的是一条儒家独有的 “内在超越” 路径：超越性的 “天理”，并非像佛老所说的那样悬空在外，而是内在于人的心性之中，也体现在日常的人伦琐事之上；因此，体认天理的方式，绝不是离开现实生活去追求虚无的彼岸，而是必须通过 “格物致知” 的下学功夫，在事亲、事君、处友这类日常实践中践行 “敬” 与 “义”，逐步显现自身本有的 “明德”。这一逻辑，既保证了儒学的超越性，又牢牢扎根于人伦日用，完全区别于佛老的 “虚无寂灭之教”。

In the eyes of the Cheng-Zhu school, the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” of The Great Learning was precisely the unique weapon with which Confucianism combated the “outer transcendence” of Buddhism and Daoism. It marked out a path of “inner transcendence” exclusive to Confucianism: the transcendent “Heavenly Principle” is not, as Buddhism and Daoism claim, suspended somewhere outside; it is immanent in the human mind-and-nature and also manifested in the trivialities of daily human relations. Therefore, the way to recognize Heavenly Principle is absolutely not to abandon real life in pursuit of a nihilistic other shore; rather, one must, through the lower-level learning effort of “investigation of things and extension of knowledge,” practice “reverence” and “rightness” in such everyday activities as serving one’s parents, serving one’s ruler, and interacting with friends, thereby gradually manifesting one’s own originally possessed “illustrious virtue.”This logic both guaranteed the transcendence of Confucianism and kept it firmly rooted in everyday human relations, completely distinguishing it from the “teachings of nihilistic emptiness and extinction” of Buddhism and Daoism.

朱熹在《大学章句》的序言中，将这场理论对决的底牌完全摊开：他直言，孟子去世后，儒学的圣人之道就失传了，俗儒沉迷于记诵词章，对道德修养毫无用处；而佛老的异端之说，虽然在心性问题上的思辨高度超过了传统儒学，却完全脱离现实人伦，追求虚无的超越，最终无法指导社会实践。正因如此，《大学》的 “入德之门” 才显得尤为珍贵 —— 它是孔氏遗书，由曾参、子思、孟子一系传承下来，是儒家独有的、由 “下学人事” 上达 “天理” 的完整进路；学者只有通过《大学》的 “入德之门”，才能真正理解儒家的 “内圣外王” 之道，抵御佛老的异端邪说。

In the preface to his Commentary on The Great Learning, Zhu Xi laid all his cards on the table in this theoretical showdown. He bluntly stated that after Mencius’s death, the sage’s Way of Confucianism was lost; vulgar Confucians indulged in memorizing and reciting phrases and literary compositions, which were utterly useless for moral cultivation, while the heterodox theories of Buddhism and Daoism, though surpassing traditional Confucianism in speculative heights on issues of mind-and-nature, were completely divorced from real human relations and pursued a nihilistic transcendence that ultimately could not guide social practice. It was precisely for this reason that the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” of The Great Learning was so precious: it was a bequeathed text of Confucius, handed down through the line of Zeng Shen, Zisi, and Mencius, and it was the unique Confucian, complete pathway ascending from “lower-level learning about human affairs” up to “Heavenly Principle.” Only through the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” of The Great Learning could a scholar truly understand the Confucian way of “inner sageliness and outer kingship” and resist the heterodox doctrines of Buddhism and Daoism.

可以说，程朱对 “入德之门” 的理论建构，是儒学在理论上的一次绝地反击：它不仅为儒家道德找到了形而上的终极依据，更证明了儒学的 “内在超越”，远比佛老的 “外在超越” 更具现实合理性，也更符合中国人的文化特质 —— 正是这一理论，将儒学重新拉回中国思想界的主轴。

It can be said that the Cheng-Zhu theoretical construction of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” was a last-ditch counterattack by Confucianism on the theoretical front: it not only found an ultimate metaphysical foundation for Confucian morality, but also proved that Confucian “inner transcendence” was far more practically rational than the “outer transcendence” of Buddhism and Daoism, and more in keeping with the cultural character of the Chinese people – it was precisely this theory that pulled Confucianism back to the central axis of Chinese intellectual life.

二、实践层面：确立可操作的下学功夫，重构教育次第

II. The Practical Dimension: Establishing Workable Lower-Level Learning Effort and Reconstructing the Educational Sequence

程朱之所以极力凸显 “入德之门” 的地位，不光是出于理论建构的需求，更是对当时教育乱象、道德修养脱离实际的回应。在他们看来，汉唐以来的学术教育，困于繁琐的记诵训诂，追求浮华的文章辞藻，要么缺乏明确的道德进阶路径，要么空谈心性，违背了儒家修己治人的本旨。既然要重建儒学的社会权威，就必须用 “入德之门” 来重构可落地的道德修养阶梯，重塑以 “圣贤” 为终极目标的教育次第，把理论层面的 “天理”，转化为人人可通过日常实践达成的德行。

The reason why the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi so vigorously highlighted the position of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” was not only due to the needs of theoretical construction, but also a response to the educational chaos of their time and the divorce of moral cultivation from reality. In their view, the scholarship and education since the Han and Tang dynasties were mired in tedious memorization, recitation, and philological glosses, pursuing flowery literary phrasing, and either lacked a clear path of moral advancement or indulged in empty talk about mind-and-nature, contravening the Confucian original purpose of cultivating oneself and governing others. Since they intended to rebuild the social authority of Confucianism, they had to use the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” to reconstruct a workable ladder of moral cultivation and to reshape an educational sequence with “sagehood” as its ultimate goal, transforming the theoretical “Heavenly Principle” into virtues that every person could achieve through daily practice.

2.1 为道德修养提供由浅入深的渐进路径

2.1 Providing a Gradual Path from the Shallow to the Deep for Moral Cultivation

“入德之门” 的实践意义，在于它明确了一条可操作、可验证的道德修养进阶路径 ——“下学上达”，即从日常小事做起，经过日积月累的道德实践，逐步达到与天理合一的圣人境界。这一进路，是程朱针对当时学者的两大通病 ——“不明本末先后” 和 “空谈性命，不务实学”—— 专门设计的。

The practical significance of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” lies in its clear articulation of a workable and verifiable advancement path for moral cultivation: “lower-level learning reaching upward,” that is, starting from small everyday matters and, through accumulated moral practice over time, gradually reaching the sage’s state of union with Heavenly Principle. This approach was specifically designed by the Cheng-Zhu school to address the two common maladies of scholars of their time: “not understanding the distinction between root and branch, or what comes first and what comes later,” and “idly discussing nature and destiny without devoting oneself to practical learning.”

二程认为，道德修养的关键是 “知本末终始”。《大学》的 “八条目”，本质上是一套以 “修身” 为枢纽的完整因果逻辑：“格物、致知、诚意、正心” 是向内省察的 “内圣” 功夫，是 “本”；“齐家、治国、平天下” 是向外实践的 “外王” 事业，是 “末”。在修养过程中，必须先夯实内在的道德根基，才能进一步成就外在的社会事业；反过来，也只有通过外在的事功实践，才能真正检验、巩固内在的德行修养。“八条目” 的顺序不能乱，更不能割裂 —— 这是古人为学的唯一正确顺序，而《大学》的 “入德之门”，正是这个循序渐进修养过程的起点。

The Cheng brothers held that the key to moral cultivation is “knowing the root and branch, the beginning and the end.” The “eight items” of The Great Learning are, in essence, a complete causal logic pivoting on “self-cultivation”: “investigation of things, extension of knowledge, sincerity of the will, and rectification of the mind” are the inwardly examining effort of “inner sageliness” – the “root”; “regulation of the family, ordering of the state, and bringing peace to the whole world” are the outwardly practicing enterprise of “outer kingship” – the “branch.” In the cultivation process, one must first consolidate the inner moral foundation before one can further achieve outer social enterprises; conversely, only through outer practical achievements can one truly test and consolidate inner moral cultivation. The sequence of the “eight items” must not be disordered, and still less can they be split apart – this is the sole correct order for the ancients’ learning, and the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” of The Great Learning is precisely the starting point of this step-by-step cultivation process.

若没有《大学》给出的这个明确 “次第”，学者往往会陷入两种误区：一是忽视基础功夫，直接空谈 “明明德” 的终极境界，忽视了在日常事务中践行道德这一基本前提；二是把道德修养当成纯粹的知识学习，忽视了从 “致知” 到 “诚意” 的内省实践。程颐在《二程遗书》中直言，“入德之门，无如《大学》”——《大学》的价值，正在于它保留了这一明确的 “为学次第”，能让初学者在道德实践中找到清晰的抓手，避免迷失方向。

Without this clear “sequence” provided by The Great Learning, scholars often fall into two errors: one is to neglect foundational effort and directly engage in empty talk about the ultimate state of “illustrating illustrious virtue,” ignoring the basic premise of practicing morality in everyday affairs; the other is to treat moral cultivation as a purely intellectual exercise, neglecting the inward reflective practice from “extension of knowledge” to “sincerity of the will.” Cheng Yi stated plainly in the Surviving Writings of the Two Cheng Brothers: “For the Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood , nothing compares to The Great Learning.” The value of The Great Learning, he argued, lies precisely in its preservation of this clear “sequence of learning,” which allows beginners to find a firm handle in moral practice and avoid losing their way.

朱熹进一步发展了这一 “次第” 思想，将 “入德之门” 的实践功夫明确为 “格物致知” 与 “主敬涵养” 两大支撑，二者缺一不可。

Zhu Xi further developed this “sequence” thinking, explicitly defining the practical effort of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” as two supporting pillars – “investigation of things and extension of knowledge” on the one hand, and “abiding in reverence and nurturing with reverence” on the other – neither of which can be dispensed with.

其一，“格物致知” 是入德的 “下手处”。朱熹在《大学章句》中补充的 “格物致知” 章，是他对 “入德之门” 的核心发挥：“格物” 的本质是 “即物”，也就是深入具体的日常事务；“穷理” 是探究这些事务背后蕴含的天理。在他看来，天理并不悬在半空，而是承载于日常事物之中；任何人都必须通过接触具体事物、探究其道理，才能逐步体认内心本具的天理。这一思路，彻底堵死了佛老 “空悟” 的进路，把道德实践锚定在真实的人伦日用之中。

First, “investigation of things and extension of knowledge” is the “starting point” for entering virtue. The “investigation of things and extension of knowledge” chapter that Zhu Xi supplemented in his Commentary on The Great Learning represents his core development of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood .” The essence of “investigation of things” is “approaching things,” that is, going deep into concrete everyday affairs; “exhausting principle” is exploring the Heavenly Principle inherent behind these affairs. In his view, Heavenly Principle is not suspended in midair; it is embodied in everyday things. Everyone must, through contact with concrete things and inquiry into their principles, gradually recognize the Heavenly Principle originally inherent in the mind. This line of thinking completely blocked the Buddhist and Daoist path of “empty enlightenment” and anchored moral practice firmly in real, daily human relations.

其二，“主敬涵养” 是贯穿入德全过程的修养心法。程颐提出 “涵养须用敬，进学则在致知”——“敬” 是指内心的专注、敬畏与警觉，不被私欲牵引，不被杂念干扰。朱熹对此极为推崇，称这两句话是 “入德之门” 的核心要诀，他进一步解释：“主敬” 并非让人终日端坐、不思不动，而是在格物时要保持专一的心态，在日常待人处事中要谨言慎行，在闲居时要坚守内心的警醒，让 “敬” 贯穿于从初学圣人之学到体悟天理的整个过程。

Second, “abiding in reverence and nurturing with reverence” is the mental technique of cultivation that runs through the entire process of entering virtue. Cheng Yi proposed: “To nurture oneself, one must use reverence; to advance in learning, it lies in the extension of knowledge.” “Reverence” refers to inner concentration, awe, and vigilance, not being led astray by selfish desires or disturbed by stray thoughts. Zhu Xi greatly esteemed this, calling these two sentences the core secret of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood .” He further explained: “Abiding in reverence” does not mean sitting rigidly all day without thinking or moving; rather, when investigating things, one must maintain a focused mindset; in daily dealings with others, one must be cautious in speech and conduct; in moments of leisure, one must maintain inner alertness – letting “reverence” run through the whole process, from the first learning of the sages’ teachings to the realization of Heavenly Principle.

由此可见，程朱的 “入德之门” 并非单纯的理论认知，而是一套 “知行相须互发” 的实践体系：“格物” 是基础，通过与事物接触、探究事物的道理，获得明确的道德认识；“主敬” 是保障，通过内心的专注敬畏，将道德认识转化为真实的道德信念；“诚意”“正心” 是关键，将外在的道德规范内化为自觉的德行；“齐家、治国、平天下” 则是最终归宿，将个体的道德价值扩展为社会层面的伦理实践。

From this we can see that the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” of the Cheng-Zhu school is not merely theoretical cognition; it is a practical system in which “knowledge and action require each other and stimulate each other.” “Investigation of things” is the foundation: through contact with things and inquiry into their principles, one obtains clear moral knowledge. “Abiding in reverence” is the safeguard: through inner concentration and awe, moral knowledge is transformed into genuine moral conviction. “Sincerity of the will” and “rectification of the mind” are the keys: external moral norms are internalized into self-conscious virtue. “Regulation of the family, ordering of the state, and bringing peace to the whole world” are the final destination: individual moral value is extended into ethical practice on the social plane.

这一整套实践路径，完全是可落地、可执行的：它不要求学者脱离日常的生活与工作，也不依赖于虚无的彼岸体验；相反，它将体认天理的 “下学” 功夫，落实在事亲、事君、处友、待人接物的每一件日常琐事中，通过日积月累的渐进实践，逐步实现 “上达天理” 的终极目标 —— 这正是程朱将其定为 “入德之门” 的核心原因。

This entire practical path is completely workable and executable: it does not require scholars to leave behind their daily life and work, nor does it depend on nihilistic otherworldly experiences. On the contrary, it grounds the “lower-level learning” effort of recognizing Heavenly Principle in every trivial daily matter – serving one’s parents, serving one’s ruler, interacting with friends, and dealing with people and things – and through gradual, accumulated practice over time, it progressively achieves the ultimate goal of “reaching upward to Heavenly Principle.” This is the core reason why the Cheng-Zhu school designated it as the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood .”

2.2 由小学至大学，构建完整的儒家教育体系

2.2 From Elementary Learning to Higher Learning: Constructing a Complete Confucian Educational System

对程朱而言，“入德之门” 不止是个体的道德修养路径，更是重塑儒家教育的核心纲领 —— 其目标是将抽象的天理，转化为从儿童到成人的、循序渐进的教育实践，最终培养出能践行内圣外王之道的真正圣贤。

For the Cheng-Zhu school, the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” was not only a path for individual moral cultivation, but also the core program for reshaping Confucian education – its goal was to transform abstract Heavenly Principle into a step-by-step educational practice spanning from childhood to adulthood, ultimately cultivating genuine sages who could practice the way of inner sageliness and outer kingship.

朱熹结合程颐的 “入德” 思想，以 “大学” 为界，将整个儒家教育流程划分为 “小学” 与 “大学” 两个衔接紧密的阶段，为 “入德之门” 提供了完整的制度支撑。

Zhu Xi, combining Cheng Yi’s thought on “entering virtue” and taking the “higher learning” as a boundary, divided the whole Confucian educational process into two tightly linked stages – “elementary learning” and “higher learning” – providing a complete institutional foundation for the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood .”

小学阶段是 “入德” 的基础铺垫，其核心任务是 “学其事”，即通过日常的具体事为，如事亲、事君、事兄、处友、待人接物等，学习如何洒扫应对、如何恪守日常礼仪，在行为上养成端庄恭敬的习惯，将儒家的基本道德规范内化于行为习惯之中。朱熹打了一个形象的比方：小学阶段的行为规范训练，就像是给道德修养打地基；如果没有这个基础，到了大学阶段再去探究 “为什么要这么做” 的深层义理，就会根基不牢，难以将道理转化为真实的德行 —— 这也是他花费大量精力编著《小学》一书的初衷。

The elementary learning stage is the foundational groundwork for “entering virtue”; its core task is “learning the affairs,” that is, through concrete daily activities such as serving parents, serving the ruler, serving elder brothers, interacting with friends, and dealing with people and things, learning how to sweep and answer the door, how to observe daily rituals, developing habits of dignified and respectful conduct, and internalizing the basic Confucian moral norms into behavioral habits. Zhu Xi drew a vivid analogy: behavioral norm training at the elementary learning stage is like laying the foundation for moral cultivation; without this foundation, when one reaches the higher learning stage and seeks to explore the deeper principles of “why one should act thus,” the foundation will be weak, making it difficult to transform principles into genuine virtue – this was also his original intention in spending great effort compiling the book Elementary Learning.

大学阶段是 “入德” 的正式进阶，其核心任务是 “明其理”，即探究小学阶段所做之事背后隐藏的天理，将日常的行为习惯提升到道德自觉的层面。朱熹明确指出，《大学》是整个大学教育体系的入门教材 —— 在《四书》的编排次序中，《大学》被排在首位，之后才是《论语》《孟子》《中庸》；初学者应先从《大学》学起，掌握了修身的进阶路径，才能进一步学习其他儒家经典，否则即便读了再多经典，也不知道从何处入手提升德行。

The higher learning stage is the formal advancement of “entering virtue”; its core task is “understanding the principles,” that is, exploring the Heavenly Principle concealed behind the affairs practiced in the elementary learning stage, elevating everyday behavioral habits to the level of moral self-consciousness. Zhu Xi explicitly pointed out that The Great Learning was the introductory textbook for the entire higher education system: in the arrangement of the Four Books, The Great Learning was placed first, with the Analects, Mencius, and Doctrine of the Mean coming after it. Beginners should first study The Great Learning; only after mastering the advancement path of self-cultivation could they move on to other Confucian classics. Otherwise, even if they read many classics, they would not know where to start in elevating their virtue.

在具体的教学实践中，二程、朱熹对《大学》的 “格物” 条目进行了重点阐释，将其作为教学的起点。在他们看来，“格物” 是学者修学的第一抓手 —— 只有先通过 “格物” 探究事物的深层道理，才能获得正确的道德认识；只有获得正确的道德认识，才能做到 “诚意”“正心”，最终实现修身的目标。朱熹尤其重视这一点：他耗费四十余年精力注解《大学》，对 “格物致知” 的内涵进行了层层深入的解读；并且，他在《大学章句》中特意补充了失传的 “格物致知” 章传文，就是为了让学者能精准把握这一入德的下手处，掌握实践的关键抓手。

In concrete teaching practice, the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi gave focused exposition to the “investigation of things” item in The Great Learning, making it the starting point of instruction. In their view, “investigation of things” was the first handle for a scholar’s learning: only by first investigating things to explore their deeper principles could one obtain correct moral knowledge; only by obtaining correct moral knowledge could one achieve “sincerity of the will” and “rectification of the mind,” finally realizing the goal of self-cultivation. Zhu Xi placed particular emphasis on this: he spent more than forty years of energy annotating The Great Learning, providing layer upon layer of in-depth interpretation of the meaning of “investigation of things and extension of knowledge.” Moreover, in his Commentary on The Great Learning, he deliberately supplemented the lost commentary on the “investigation of things and extension of knowledge” chapter precisely so that scholars could accurately grasp this starting point for entering virtue and master the crucial handle for practice.

除此之外，程朱还将 “主敬涵养” 的功夫，融入到《大学》的教学细节之中。程颐提出 “主一无适” 的概念，将 “敬” 定义为精神的高度专一，不被外物所诱惑；朱熹则要求学者在读书时要端坐正容、全神贯注，在日常处事中要谨言慎行、时刻约束自身行为，将 “主敬” 作为贯穿《大学》学习全过程的基本态度 —— 在他看来，唯有保持 “敬” 的状态，才能在格物时不被私欲蒙蔽，真正认识到事物的道理。

In addition, the Cheng-Zhu school integrated the effort of “abiding in reverence and nurturing with reverence” into the details of The Great Learning’s instruction. Cheng Yi proposed the concept of “abiding in oneness without distraction,” defining “reverence” as an extreme singleness of spirit, not seduced by external things. Zhu Xi required that scholars, when reading, sit upright with a proper countenance and full concentration; in daily dealings, be cautious in speech and conduct and constantly discipline their own behavior; and take “abiding in reverence” as the fundamental attitude running through the entire study of The Great Learning. In his view, only by maintaining a state of “reverence” could one, when investigating things, avoid being blinded by selfish desires and truly recognize the principles of things.

可以说，程朱的 “入德之门”，本质上是一套完整的 “学而至圣” 教育逻辑：它不是少数精英的神秘体验，而是面向所有普通人的、可落地的成长路径；它将 “圣人” 的高远目标，拆解为从小学到大学的日常课程和实践，让学者通过日积月累的持续修行，一步一个脚印，最终实现 “变化气质”、复归天理的圣人境界 —— 这正是程朱重构儒家教育次第的核心宗旨。

It can be said that the Cheng-Zhu “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” is, in essence, a complete educational logic of “learning and thereby reaching sagehood.” It is not a mystical experience for a few elites, but a workable growth path open to all ordinary people. It breaks down the lofty goal of “sage” into daily curricula and practices from elementary learning to higher learning, enabling scholars, through continual, accumulated cultivation over time, step by step, to ultimately realize the sage’s state of “transforming one’s physical nature” and returning to Heavenly Principle – this is precisely the core purpose of the Cheng-Zhu reconstruction of the Confucian educational sequence.

三、历史语境与现代解读

III. Historical Context and Modern Interpretation

要真正理解二程、朱熹推崇 “入德之门” 的深层考量，需要将其放回特定的历史语境中 —— 这是儒学在新的历史条件下，进行自我革新、自我重构以回应时代危机的产物。同时，这一思想对后世的儒学发展、教育模式，乃至今天的道德建设与人文教育，都影响深远。

To truly understand the deeper considerations behind the Cheng brothers’ and Zhu Xi’s esteem for the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ,” one must place it back into its specific historical context – it was the product of Confucianism’s self-renewal and self-reconstruction under new historical conditions in response to the crisis of the era. At the same time, this thought has profoundly influenced later Confucian development, educational models, and even today’s moral construction and humanistic education.

3.1 道统重建与经典重构

3.1 Reconstruction of the Orthodoxy of the Way and Reconfiguration of the Classics

从儒学自身发展的轨迹来看，程朱对 “入德之门” 的表彰，本质上是一场 “道统重建” 与 “经典重构” 的双重运动。

Seen from the trajectory of Confucianism’s own development, the Cheng-Zhu promotion of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” was, in essence, a dual movement of “reconstructing the orthodoxy of the Way” and “reconfiguring the classics.”

在程朱之前，《大学》只是《礼记》中的一篇，其作为独立经典的价值并未被充分认知；而二程将《大学》从《礼记》中独立出来，重新编排章节、加以系统性注解，朱熹又花费毕生精力著《大学章句》，将其提升到儒家经典的核心位置 —— 这一 “经典重构” 的背后，是程朱对儒家 “道统” 的重新接续。他们认为，儒家有一个由尧、舜、禹、汤、文、武、周公，再由孔子传至曾子、子思、孟子的 “道统”，但孟子去世后，这个 “道统” 就失传了，“入德之门” 的为学次第也随之湮没。

Before the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi, The Great Learning was merely one chapter in the Book of Rites, and its value as an independent classic had not been fully recognized. The Cheng brothers extracted The Great Learning from the Book of Rites, rearranged its sections and provided systematic annotations, and Zhu Xi then spent his lifelong energy writing Commentary on The Great Learning, elevating it to a core position among the Confucian classics. Behind this “classics reconfiguration” lay the Cheng-Zhu school’s endeavor to reconnect with the Confucian “orthodoxy of the Way.” They believed that Confucianism possessed an “orthodoxy of the Way” transmitted from Yao, Shun, Yu, Tang, Wen, Wu, and the Duke of Zhou, and then through Confucius to Zengzi, Zisi, and Mencius. However, after Mencius’s death, this orthodoxy of the Way was lost, and the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” sequence of learning was consequently submerged.

在程朱看来，《大学》的特殊价值，在于它是 “孔氏之遗书”，是儒家 “道统” 的唯一载体；它所记录的 “入德之门”，是古代圣王修己治人的 “内圣外王” 之道的浓缩，也是连接 “道统” 与 “学统” 的关键纽带 —— 学者只有通过《大学》的 “入德之门”，才能真正理解儒家圣人的本意，上接儒家失传的 “道统”。

In the Cheng-Zhu view, the special value of The Great Learning lay in its being “a bequeathed text of Confucius,” the sole carrier of the Confucian “orthodoxy of the Way.” The “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” recorded in it was the concentrated essence of the ancient sage kings’ way of “inner sageliness and outer kingship” in cultivating themselves and governing others, and also the crucial link connecting the “orthodoxy of the Way” with the “scholarly tradition.” Only through the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” of The Great Learning could scholars truly understand the original intent of the Confucian sages and reconnect upward with the lost Confucian orthodoxy of the Way.

在 “道统” 意识的支撑下，程朱将《大学》与《论语》《孟子》《中庸》合编为《四书》，并对《四书》的教学次序进行了精心编排，将《大学》列为四书之首，将其提升到《六经》之上的位置。这一经典重构的逻辑背后，是程朱对教育价值的重新定义：他们认为，《六经》多是关于具体政治制度、历史事件的记载，内容过于宏阔，不适合作为初学者的教材；而《大学》给出的 “入德之门”，是一套由浅入深、循序渐进的为学次第，能让学者先掌握修身的基本方法，再去研读六经，才能真正理解其中的义理。

Supported by this consciousness of the “orthodoxy of the Way,” the Cheng-Zhu school combined The Great Learning with the Analects, Mencius, and Doctrine of the Mean into the Four Books, carefully arranged their teaching sequence, placed The Great Learning at the head of the Four Books, and elevated it to a position even above the Six Classics. Behind the logic of this classics reconfiguration was a redefinition of educational value by the Cheng-Zhu school: they held that the Six Classics mostly consisted of records about concrete political institutions and historical events; their content was too vast and grand to serve as teaching material for beginners. By contrast, the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” provided by The Great Learning was a step-by-step, progressive sequence of learning that allowed scholars first to grasp the basic method of self-cultivation, after which they could go on to study the Six Classics and only then truly understand the principles within them.

这一重构，对后世儒学的发展产生了决定性影响：它将儒学的核心议题，从汉唐的政治实践、训诂考据，转移到 “入德” 的心性修养与道德实践上；更重要的是，它为后世儒家提供了标准化的 “入德” 文本 —— 从元代会试开始，《四书章句集注》被定为官方指定教材，《大学》的 “入德之门” 成为后世儒生的必修课程，主导了中国传统教育近七百年的发展方向。

This reconfiguration had a decisive impact on the later development of Confucianism: it shifted the core concerns of Confucianism from the political practice, philology, and textual criticism of the Han and Tang to the mind-nature cultivation and moral practice of “entering virtue.” More importantly, it provided later Confucians with a standardized “entering virtue” text: starting from the civil examinations of the Yuan dynasty, the Collected Commentaries on the Four Books was designated as the officially prescribed textbook, and the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” of The Great Learning became a mandatory curriculum for later Confucian students, dominating the direction of traditional Chinese education for nearly seven hundred years.

3.2 对后世儒学及教育的影响

3.2 Influence on Later Confucianism and Education

二程、朱熹的 “入德之门” 思想，是中国儒学史、教育史上的一座重要里程碑。它不仅重塑了儒学的理论特质，更深刻影响了中国后期封建社会的教育理念、学术走向和道德实践。

The Cheng-Zhu thought on the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” is an important milestone in the history of Chinese Confucianism and education. It not only reshaped the theoretical character of Confucianism but also profoundly influenced the educational concepts, academic trends, and moral practice of late imperial China.

就学术层面而言，程朱对 “入德之门” 的阐释，重新划定了儒学与佛老之间的边界，推动儒学发展进入了一个全新的阶段。“入德之门” 所揭示的 “下学上达”、“格物致知” 与 “主敬涵养” 相结合的实践路径，以及 “由粗入精”、“由浅入深” 的为学次第，将儒家的道德实践牢牢锚定在现实的人伦日用之中 —— 既坚持了道德的超越性，又杜绝了空谈性命、脱离实际的弊病，形成了与 “陆王心学” 完全不同的理学风格。后世理学家的学术研究，基本都是在程朱开辟的这一 “入德” 框架内，对 “格物”“主敬” 等功夫进行进一步的细化和发挥。

On the academic level, the Cheng-Zhu interpretation of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” redrew the boundary between Confucianism and Buddhism/Daoism, propelling Confucian development into an entirely new phase. The practical path revealed by the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” – the combination of “lower-level learning reaching upward,” “investigation of things and extension of knowledge,” and “abiding in reverence and nurturing with reverence,” along with the “from coarse to refined” and “from shallow to deep” learning sequence – firmly anchored Confucian moral practice in real, daily human relations. It maintained the transcendence of morality while eradicating the ills of empty talk about nature and destiny divorced from reality, forming a Neo-Confucian style completely distinct from the “Lu-Wang School of Mind.” The scholarly research of later Neo-Confucians basically carried out further refinement and elaboration of efforts such as “investigation of things” and “abiding in reverence” within this “entering virtue” framework opened up by the Cheng-Zhu school.

从教育维度来看，“入德之门” 的提出，意味着程朱建立了一套完整的、以道德养成为核心目标的儒家教育体系，彻底重塑了中国传统教育的气质。从元代至清末，《大学》被列为科举考试的核心科目，“三纲领八条目” 成为全国学子必读的道德修养课程；这一教育体系的核心目标，不是传授单纯的文字知识，而是培养 “内圣外王” 的圣贤人格，教导学子通过 “格物致知”“诚意正心” 的下学功夫，逐步实现 “明明德”、“止于至善” 的终极境界 —— 这一思路，主导了中国传统教育的发展方向长达七百余年。

From the educational dimension, the articulation of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” signified that the Cheng-Zhu school had established a complete Confucian educational system with moral formation as its core objective, thoroughly reshaping the ethos of traditional Chinese education. From the Yuan dynasty to the end of the Qing, The Great Learning was listed as a core subject in the civil service examinations, and the “three guiding principles and eight items” became a moral cultivation curriculum that all students nationwide had to study. The core objective of this educational system was not to transmit purely textual knowledge, but to cultivate the sage personality of “inner sageliness and outer kingship,” teaching students, through the lower-level learning efforts of “investigation of things and extension of knowledge” and “sincerity of the will and rectification of the mind,” to gradually realize the ultimate states of “illustrating illustrious virtue” and “resting in the highest good” – this line of thought dominated the developmental direction of traditional Chinese education for more than seven hundred years.

从道德实践的角度来说，“入德之门” 给出的是一套普通人可执行、可落地的道德成长路径，将 “圣人” 这一高远的道德目标，从神坛上拉到了普通人的面前。它不要求世人具备超凡的资质，也不要求人们脱离日常的生活与工作；相反，它将道德实践落脚在日常的洒扫应对、事亲事君待人接物之中，通过日积月累的持续实践，逐步变化气质、回归善性 —— 这套逻辑，塑造了传统中国人 “修身齐家” 的道德人格。

From the perspective of moral practice, the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” provided a moral growth path that ordinary people could execute and actualize, bringing the lofty moral goal of “sagehood” down from the altar to the level of ordinary people. It did not demand extraordinary innate ability, nor did it require people to leave behind their daily life and work. On the contrary, it grounded moral practice in everyday sweeping and answering, serving parents and rulers, and dealing with people and things, gradually transforming one’s physical nature and returning to goodness through accumulated, sustained practice over time – this logic shaped the moral personality of traditional Chinese people centered on “self-cultivation and regulation of the family.”

3.3 现代意义与价值重估

3.3 Modern Significance and Re-evaluation of Value

从现代的视角来看，程朱理学的客观唯心主义世界观、封闭的八股化教育载体，以及部分与现代社会脱节的人伦教条，无疑需要进行批判性的扬弃；但他们所揭示的 “入德之门”—— 这套关于道德修养的方法论、关于人文教育的次第逻辑，却包含着普遍性的价值内核，对今天的道德建设与人文教育，仍有着重要的参考意义。

From a modern perspective, the objective-idealist worldview of Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism, the closed educational vehicle of the eight-legged essay, and some human-relations dogmas that are out of step with modern society undoubtedly need to be critically sublated. However, the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” they revealed – this methodology of moral cultivation and the sequential logic of humanistic education – contains a universal core of value that still holds important referential significance for today’s moral construction and humanistic education.

其一，“入德之门” 所强调的 “下学上达”、道德实践要从日常小事做起的基本逻辑，对纠正现代社会的道德危机具有参考价值。程朱将道德修养锚定在人伦日用之中，反对脱离现实、空谈道德的思路，切中了现代社会的某些弊病：现代社会的道德教育，往往流于空洞的理论说教，忽视了日常行为的细节涵养，导致道德认知与实际行为的严重脱节；而 “入德之门” 的启示，正在于它告诉我们：高远的道德理想，必须落地在具体的日常事务之中。

First, the basic logic emphasized by the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” – “lower-level learning reaching upward” and that moral practice must begin with small everyday matters – has referential value for correcting the moral crisis of modern society. The Cheng-Zhu school anchored moral cultivation in daily human relations and opposed thinking that was divorced from reality and merely indulged in empty moral talk, thus hitting upon certain maladies of modern society: moral education in modern society often degenerates into hollow theoretical preaching, neglecting the subtle cultivation of daily conduct, leading to a serious disconnect between moral cognition and actual behavior. The inspiration of the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” lies precisely in its teaching that lofty moral ideals must be grounded in concrete, everyday affairs.

其二，“入德之门” 所蕴含的 “为学次第” 教育思想，对现代人文教育的实践具有重要的借鉴意义。程朱强调，儿童与成人的教育目标、教学内容应有所区分，必须遵循由浅入深、由具体到抽象、由行为习惯到义理认知的循序渐进原则 —— 这正是现代教育所倡导的分层化、循序渐进式教学理念；而现代人文教育的部分困境，恰恰是违背了这一基本规律：在基础教育阶段，忽视日常行为规范的训练，过早地灌输空洞的道德理论，反而消解了学生的德行成长空间。

Second, the educational thought of the “sequence of learning” contained in the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” has important referential significance for the practice of modern humanistic education. The Cheng-Zhu school stressed that the educational objectives and teaching content for children and adults should be differentiated, and that one must follow the step-by-step principle from shallow to deep, from concrete to abstract, and from behavioral habits to principled understanding—precisely the stratified, progressive teaching philosophy advocated by modern education. Some of the difficulties of modern humanistic education stem precisely from violating this basic law: in the stage of basic education, training in daily behavioral norms is neglected, and hollow moral theories are instilled too early, actually eroding the space for students’ moral growth.

其三，“入德之门” 中 “格物致知” 与 “主敬涵养” 并重的功夫思想，对现代社会的人格培养具有借鉴价值。“格物致知” 强调通过探究事物的道理来提升认知水平，这与现代科学的实证精神有一定的契合之处；“主敬涵养” 强调内心的专注、敬畏与自我省察，这正是现代社会所缺乏的精神特质：在当下这个信息碎片化、人心浮躁、物欲横行的时代，人们的精神世界普遍缺乏定力和敬畏心，充斥着焦虑与迷茫。而 “主敬” 的功夫，正是教导人们收束心思、专注做事、保持敬畏心、恪守道德边界，在自我省察中不断提升道德境界，实现内心的安定与丰盈。

Third, the effort thought in the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” that gives equal weight to “investigation of things and extension of knowledge” and “abiding in reverence and nurturing with reverence” has referential value for personality cultivation in modern society. “Investigation of things and extension of knowledge” emphasizes elevating the cognitive level through inquiring into the principles of things, which has a certain resonance with the empirical spirit of modern science. “Abiding in reverence and nurturing with reverence” emphasizes inner focus, awe, and self-reflection – precisely the spiritual traits that modern society lacks. In our present era of fragmented information, restless minds, and rampant material desires, people’s spiritual world generally lacks steadiness and a sense of awe and is filled with anxiety and confusion. The effort of “abiding in reverence” is precisely the teaching to gather one’s mind, focus on tasks, maintain a sense of awe, abide by moral boundaries, and constantly elevate one’s moral state through self-reflection, achieving inner calm and fullness.

二程、朱熹对 “入德之门” 的强调，绝非是对一篇儒家经典的偶然推崇或简单学术考证，而是中国思想史上一次具有里程碑意义的学术重构，是儒学在隋唐佛道冲击之后，绝地反击以重塑自身生命力的自觉尝试。它具有明确的理论和现实针对性：在理论层面，是要为儒家道德伦理建立 “天理” 本体论的支撑，构建起可以与佛老之学相抗衡的完整道德形上学；在实践层面，是要重建一套可操作、可落地、由浅入深的进学路径，将抽象的天理教化，转化为从儿童到成人的、循序渐进的道德实践。

The emphasis that the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi placed on the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” was by no means a fortuitous esteem for one Confucian classic or a simple piece of scholarly textual research; rather, it was a landmark academic reconfiguration in the history of Chinese thought – a conscious endeavor by Confucianism, after the shocks of Buddhism and Daoism during the Sui and Tang dynasties, to counterattack desperately and reshape its own vitality. It had a clear theoretical and practical pertinence: on the theoretical level, it was meant to establish the support of a “Heavenly Principle” ontology for Confucian morality and ethics and to construct a complete moral metaphysics capable of standing against the teachings of Buddhism and Daoism; on the practical level, it was meant to reconstruct a workable, implementable, progressively deepening learning path that could transform abstract Heavenly Principle edification into a step-by-step moral practice from childhood to adulthood.

程朱的历史功绩，在于他们将《大学》从《礼记》中独立出来，重新编排诠释，建立起 “格物致知、诚意正心、修身齐家、治国平天下” 的完整逻辑，将 “入德之门” 定位为沟通形上的天理世界与形下的道德实践的枢纽性桥梁；他们所建构的 “下学上达” 的理论路径与实践功夫，成功解决了此前儒学发展中面临的两大核心挑战：一方面，它为儒家的内圣外王之道提供了形而上的理论支撑，解决了儒学理论思辨度不足、难以与佛老抗衡的时代问题；另一方面，它为普通学者提供了一条必须由浅入深、由粗入精的渐进修养路径，将抽象的天理，转化为人人可以通过日常践履达成的道德实践，重塑了儒家的 “修己治人” 之学。

The historical achievement of the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi lies in the fact that they extracted The Great Learning from the Book of Rites, rearranged and reinterpreted it, established the complete logic of “investigation of things and extension of knowledge, sincerity of the will and rectification of the mind, self-cultivation and regulation of the family, ordering of the state and bringing peace to the whole world,” and positioned the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ” as the pivotal bridge connecting the metaphysical world of Heavenly Principle with the concrete moral practice of the physical world. The theoretical path and practical effort of “lower-level learning reaching upward” that they constructed successfully resolved the two core challenges that the previous development of Confucianism had faced: on the one hand, it provided metaphysical theoretical support for the Confucian way of inner sageliness and outer kingship, solving the epochal problem that Confucian theory lacked sufficient speculative sophistication to rival Buddhism and Daoism; on the other hand, it provided ordinary scholars with a gradual cultivation path that had to proceed from the shallow to the deep and from the coarse to the refined, transforming abstract Heavenly Principle into moral practice that everyone could achieve through daily performance, thereby reshaping the Confucian learning of “cultivating oneself and governing others.”

[参考文献.References]

陈来. (2000). 朱子哲学研究. 华东师范大学出版社.

Chen, L. (2000). Research on Master Zhu’s philosophy. East China Normal University Press.

陈来. (2004). 宋明理学. 华东师范大学出版社.

Chen, L. (2004). Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism. East China Normal University Press.

程颢, 程颐. (2000). 二程遗书. 上海古籍出版社.

Cheng, H., & Cheng, Y. (2000). Surviving writings of the two Cheng brothers. Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.

冯兵. (2024). 朱子曾子学考辨及其意义. 国家哲学社会科学工作办公室项目成果, 5, 22.

Feng, B. (2024). Textual research and significance of Zhu Xi’s study on Zengzi’s works. National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, 5, 22.

郭晓东. (2020). 从小学之成到大学之始：朱熹小学论对其《大学》工夫理解的意義. 复旦学报, 4, 45–53.

Guo, X. D. (2020). From primary school completion to university initiation: The significance of Zhu Xi’s primary school theory for understanding his Great Learning praxis. Fudan University Journal, 4, 45–53.

洪明超. (2025). 入与德：朱子格物与主敬工夫的原初意义研究. 伦理与文明, 5, 42–51.

Hong, M. C. (2025). Entry and virtue: A study on the primary meaning of Zhu Xi’s gongwu and jingyang praxis. Ethics and Civilization, 5, 42–51.

李毅. (2026). 因“定”而立：《大学》思想结构新探. 头条学术期刊, 6, 15–21.

Li, Y. (2026). Establishment through “abiding”: A new exploration of the ideological structure of The Great Learning. Toutiao Academic Journal, 6, 15–21.

龙涌霖. (2024). 秩序：《大学》之道的论述结构. 哲学研究, 9, 34–43.

Long, Y. L. (2024). Order: The discourse structure of the way of The Great Learning. Philosophical Research, 9, 34–43.

龙涌霖. (2025). 志于道：《大学》格致诚正的整体结构. 哲学研究, 3, 56–64.

Long, Y. L. (2025). Aspiring to the Dao: The holistic structure of The Great Learning’s investigation and enlightenment. Philosophical Research, 3, 56–64.

钱穆. (2011). 朱子新学案. 九州出版社.

Qian, M. (2011). New studies on Master Zhu. Jiuzhou Press.

孙杰. (2025). 转化与生成：《大学》进入教育生活的理论逻辑与实践路径. 人民教育出版社.

Sun, J. (2025). Transformation and renewal: The theoretical logic and practical path of The Great Learning entering educational life. People’s Education Press.

脱脱 等. (1977). 宋史. 中华书局.

Tuo, T., et al. (1977). History of the Song dynasty. Zhonghua Book Company.

许宏志. (2024). 入德之门与当代大学生的内圣外王之道. 福州大学学生工作处.

Xu, H. Z. (2024). The Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood  and the way of inner sageliness and outer kingship for contemporary college students. Student Affairs Office of Fuzhou University.

人民日报. (2025年7月15日). 《大学》：儒家“初学入德之门”. 中国民族网.

People’s Daily. (2025, July 15). The Great Learning: Confucian “beginner’s Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood ”. China Ethnic Network.

朱熹. (1986). 朱子语类. 中华书局.

Zhu, X. (1986). Classified conversations of Master Zhu. Zhonghua Book Company.

朱熹. (2011). 四书章句集注. 中华书局.

Zhu, X. (2011). Collected commentaries on the four books. Zhonghua Book Company.